Skip to content

100 Job Strategies · 32 of 100

The Second-Best Vendor

Somebody just lost a major pitch. They now know exactly which capability cost them the deal.

10,004 viewsMedium effortPays off in 3-8 weeksExperienced specialistsAgency and services backgroundsSales and new businessConsultants
Share

In short

Companies that lose a big client pitch usually learn precisely why they lost, and the answer is frequently a capability gap. Losing focuses the mind and unlocks budget in a way that winning does not, so the runner-up is often hiring to close that specific gap within weeks — and nobody is watching them, because everyone is watching the winner.

The situation

A large retailer announces its new digital agency. The winning agency posts about it. Trade press covers it. Jobseekers notice the winner is growing and apply there, along with everyone else.

Three other agencies pitched and lost. One of them was told, in the debrief, that they were strong on creative but could not demonstrate credible data and measurement capability.

That agency now has a specific, evidenced problem, a partner who has just been beaten in front of the board, and a very clear idea of what they need to buy before the next pitch.

Nobody is applying to them. They lost.

Why this works

Losing a competitive pitch produces something rare: honest, specific, externally-validated feedback about a company's weakness. Most organisations never get that, because nobody tells them the truth.

A debrief that says "your measurement capability was not credible" is far more actionable than any internal review, and it arrives attached to a quantified loss. That combination — a named gap and a number — is what unlocks budget. The argument for hiring writes itself: we lost a contract worth this much because we lacked this capability.

Timing is unusually tight and predictable. The urgency is highest in the weeks immediately after the loss, while the memory is fresh and the next pitch is approaching. Six months later the feeling has faded and the budget has gone elsewhere.

The competition for these roles is close to zero for an entirely emotional reason: candidates associate losing with decline and avoid it. But a runner-up in a major pitch is usually a healthy company that came second, not a failing one — and it is now motivated in a way the winner is not. The winner is busy delivering; the loser is busy rebuilding.

If you have the exact capability they were found lacking, you are not a candidate. You are the answer to a question their leadership just asked out loud.

How to run it

  1. 1

    Track competitive pitches, not just wins

    Trade press, agency award announcements and procurement records name winners. The losers are usually the other known players in that category.

  2. 2

    Work out what the winner had that the others did not

    Coverage of a win frequently names the differentiator — data capability, a particular technology, sector experience. That is the gap the losers are now feeling.

  3. 3

    Target runners-up whose gap matches your skill

    This only works when you are the specific missing capability. Approaching a company whose gap you cannot fill has no advantage over a normal application.

  4. 4

    Reach the person who owns new business

    A managing partner, new business director or practice head. They lost the pitch personally and are the one who has to win the next one.

  5. 5

    Frame it around the next pitch, not the last one

    Nobody wants to discuss a defeat. "What would make the next one different" is a forward-looking conversation about the same subject.

  6. 6

    Move within weeks

    The window is short. Urgency and budget both decay quickly once the loss stops stinging.

What to say

Copy, then make it yours
Hi Dominic, I saw that the Brightwater account went to another agency last month. From the coverage it sounded like measurement and attribution were a big part of how it was decided. That's the work I do — I've built measurement practices inside two agencies, including standing one up from nothing specifically to support pitches. In both cases the point wasn't better reporting, it was being able to walk into a room and defend a number. I'm not writing about the account you lost. I'm writing about the next one you pitch for. If you're thinking about strengthening that side of the offer, I'd welcome a conversation. — Yuki

When it does not work

  • Mentioning the loss tactlessly. People are sore about recent defeats. Reference it lightly, frame everything forward, and never imply they were outclassed.
  • Companies that lost because they are struggling. Sometimes the runner-up is genuinely in decline. Check their broader position before assuming this is a rebuild rather than a retreat.
  • Guessing the gap wrong. If you cannot establish what actually decided the pitch, your pitch to them is speculative and loses its entire edge.
  • Arriving too late. After a few months the urgency dissipates and the budget is reallocated. This is a weeks-wide window.
  • Assuming every loss creates hiring. Some companies respond by cutting costs or deciding not to compete in that category again.
The takeaway

The company that won is busy delivering. The company that lost just found out exactly what it is missing — and has every reason to fix it quickly.

Questions

How do I find out who lost a pitch?

Start from the winner, which is almost always announced publicly through trade press, agency award listings or the client's own communications. The shortlist is frequently reported alongside it, and in regulated or public-sector procurement the competing bidders are often a matter of public record. Where the shortlist is not published, the plausible losers are usually the small number of established competitors in that category, which is generally enough to work with.

How do I know what capability they were missing?

Coverage of a win commonly names the deciding factor, because the winning side wants to advertise it and journalists want a story angle. Beyond that, comparing the winner's public positioning against the runner-up's reveals the obvious differences in capability. If you genuinely cannot establish what decided it, this becomes a speculative application with no particular advantage, so it is better to move on to a pitch where the gap is legible.

Is it insensitive to contact a company about a pitch they lost?

It can be, which is why the framing has to be forward-looking. Referencing the loss once, neutrally, and immediately shifting to the next pitch keeps the conversation about capability rather than defeat. What causes offence is dwelling on it, implying they were outclassed, or appearing to take pleasure in the outcome. Handled properly, the message reads as someone who understands their commercial situation, which is unusual and welcome.

How quickly does this window close?

Within roughly one to three months. The urgency peaks in the weeks immediately following the loss, while the debrief is fresh, the partners are smarting and the next pitch is approaching. After that the feeling fades, attention moves to current work, and any budget earmarked for closing the gap tends to be absorbed elsewhere. Speed matters more here than in almost any other strategy in this series.

Find verified jobs from 100,000+ companies
Share

More from 100 Job Strategies

See all 100 in this series