Skip to content

100 Job Strategies · 39 of 100

The Awards Route

Award judges read your submission properly. No recruiter ever will.

10,004 viewsMedium effortPays off in 2-6 monthsExperienced candidatesFreelancers and consultantsAgency backgroundsSpecialists
Share

In short

Industry awards put your work in front of a panel of senior practitioners who read every entry carefully — which is more attention than any application receives. Even a shortlisting produces a credential, a reason for people to contact you and a room full of decision-makers at the ceremony.

The situation

A recruiter spends roughly seven seconds on a resume. A hiring manager gives a promising application maybe two minutes.

An award judge sits down with forty submissions, reads each one properly, discusses them with a panel of senior people in the field, and produces a considered ranking.

The same description of the same work receives two entirely different levels of attention depending on which envelope it goes into. One of those envelopes is free to enter and almost nobody in a job search thinks to use it.

Why this works

Awards invert the attention economics of job hunting. In recruitment you are one of hundreds competing for seconds of a screener's time. In an awards process you are one of dozens being read carefully by people who volunteered to evaluate work in your field.

Those judges matter independently of the outcome. They are typically senior practitioners, agency principals, department heads and established names — precisely the people whose attention is hardest to buy and who are frequently involved in hiring. Your submission reaches them in the most favourable possible framing: as work being assessed on merit rather than as a request for a job.

A shortlisting is a durable, checkable credential that changes how everything else you do is read. It appears on your resume, in your profile, in outreach messages, and it gives journalists and podcasts a reason to contact you. Unlike most self-description, it is third-party validated.

The ceremony itself is a concentrated gathering of the industry's decision-makers, and as a nominee you have a legitimate reason to be talking to any of them.

The competition is thin for a structural reason: most awards attract entries from organisations with marketing teams who do this routinely. Individual practitioners rarely enter, and many categories are genuinely under-subscribed.

How to run it

  1. 1

    Find awards in your field, including small ones

    National bodies, trade publications, regional business awards and specialist category awards. Small and regional awards have far fewer entries and the same credential value.

  2. 2

    Read last year's winners before choosing a category

    Category fit matters more than prestige. An under-subscribed niche category is a far better bet than the headline award everyone enters.

  3. 3

    Check whether individuals can enter

    Many awards accept individual, team and project entries as well as company ones. Some have specific young-practitioner or newcomer categories with very few entrants.

  4. 4

    Write to the criteria, not about yourself

    Judges score against published criteria. Structure your submission to answer each one explicitly rather than telling a general story.

  5. 5

    Lead with measurable outcomes

    Judges reward evidence. What changed, by how much, attributable to what you did — that is what separates winning entries from competent ones.

  6. 6

    Use the shortlisting immediately

    Add it everywhere, mention it in outreach, and attend the ceremony with a plan for who you want to meet.

What to say

Copy, then make it yours
Hi Priya, We met briefly at the industry awards last month — I was shortlisted in the emerging practitioner category for the supply-chain visibility project. You mentioned afterwards that your team was working on something similar and that the data-reconciliation side had been the hard part. That's essentially what my entry was about, and I've been thinking about your version of the problem since. I'm exploring my next move at the moment. If you're building that team out, I'd very much like to talk. And if not, I'd still be glad to compare notes on the reconciliation approach. — Sean

When it does not work

  • Pay-to-enter schemes. Some awards are commercial operations that shortlist almost everyone and sell tickets and trophies. Check whether judges are named and credible.
  • Expensive entry fees. Legitimate awards sometimes charge significant fees, and ceremony tickets can cost more. Weigh this carefully if you are unemployed.
  • Entering the wrong category. A strong entry in an over-subscribed headline category loses to a moderate entry in the right niche one.
  • Ignoring the published criteria. Judges score against a rubric. A beautifully written entry that does not address the criteria scores badly.
  • Confidentiality problems. Submissions often require details of work done for an employer or client. Get permission before disclosing anything.
The takeaway

The problem with applications is that nobody reads them. An awards panel is a group of senior people who have agreed, in advance, to read yours carefully.

Questions

Can individuals enter industry awards, or is it only companies?

Many awards accept individual, team and project entries alongside company ones, and a good number run specific categories for emerging practitioners, newcomers or individual contributors. Those individual categories are frequently under-subscribed because the bulk of entries come from organisations with marketing teams who enter as a matter of routine. Reading the entry rules and last year's winners tells you quickly which categories are open to you and which are realistically winnable.

How do I tell a legitimate award from a pay-to-win scheme?

Check whether the judging panel is named publicly and whether those judges are recognisable and credible in your field. Legitimate awards publish their criteria, their judges and their process. Commercial schemes tend to shortlist almost everyone, charge for trophies and ceremony tickets, and are vague about who decides. Looking at previous winners is also revealing: if they are mostly unknown and the categories are numerous and oddly specific, the award is selling recognition rather than conferring it.

Is a shortlisting worth anything if I do not win?

Frequently most of the value is in the shortlisting rather than the win. It is a third-party validated credential you can use on your resume, in your profile and in outreach, and it gives you a legitimate reason to be at the ceremony among the industry's decision-makers. Winning adds prestige, but for job-search purposes being shortlisted already achieves the two things that matter: your work was read by senior people, and you have something checkable to point at.

What if the work I want to submit belongs to my employer?

Get permission before submitting anything, and expect that some employers will decline or want to enter it themselves. Award submissions typically require specific details about clients, results and methods that may be commercially sensitive or contractually confidential. Where your employer is supportive, entering jointly is often the easier path and still attaches your name to the work. Where they are not, look for projects with less sensitivity or for personal work you own outright.

Build your free Drivetube Profile
Share

More from 100 Job Strategies

See all 100 in this series